ABC Manufacturing Company Essay

The ABC Manufacturing Company is a metal working plant beneath the direction of a plant four-in-hand who is whapn as a set disciplinarian. One day a hirer noniced Bhola, wizard of the workers, at the quantify-clock laggarding egress(p) two brains his own and the card of Nathu, a fellow worker. Since it was the rule of the go with that each man must punch out his own card, the antique asked Bhola to keep up him to the force play Director, who interpreted the incident as a direct violation of a rule and gave immediate notice of repose to both workers.The two workers came to see the force play Director on the following day. Nathu claimed innocence on the ground that he had not asked for his card to be punched and did not know at the time that it was being punched. He had been offered a ride by a friend who had already punched out and who could not wait for him to go through the punch-out procedure. Nathu was upset about his wife who was ill at national and was anxious to reach home as quickly as possible. He planned to take his card to the foreman the next morning for reinstate handst, a furnish sometimes exercised in such cases.These component were verified by Bhola. He claimed that he had punched Nathus card the same time he punched his own, not being advised of any wrongdoing. The Personnel Director was habituated to believe the story of the two men still did not feel he could reverse the action taken. He recognised that these men were good workers and had good records foregoing to this incident. Nevertheless, they had violated a rule for which the punishment was immediate discharge. He also reminded them that it was the policy of the company to enforce the rules without exception.A a couple of(prenominal) days later the Personnel Director, the coif Manager, and the Sales Manager sat unneurotic at lunch. The Sales Manager inform that he was faced with the necessity of notifying one of their best customers that his order must be dela yed because of the liability of one surgical incision to conform to schedule. The department in oppugn was the one from which the two workers had been discharged. Not whole had it been impossible to replace these men to date, but disgruntlement over the incident had led to real decline in the cooperation of the other workers.The Personnel Director and the Sales Manager took the property that the discha rge of these two valuable men could meet been avoided if there had been provision for onsidering the circumstances of the case. They pointed out that the incident was costly to the company in the possible loss of a customer, in the dissatisfaction within the employee group, and in the time and property that would be involved in recruiting and provision replacements.The Plant Manager could not assort with this point of view. We must have rules if we are to have efficiency and the rules are no god unless we enforce them. Furthermore, if we start considering wholly these variat ions in circumstances, we will find ourselves preposterous down with everybody thinking he is an exception. He admitted that the grievances were frequent but countered with the point that they could be of little consequence if the contract concord to by the union was followed to the letter